To encourage all SAS members to participate in the important process of recognizing the accomplishments of our members, the nomination form is very brief. We encourage self-nominations as well as nominations of others. The SAS Awards Committee especially encourages creative nominations (i.e., for individuals or teams) and will recognize multiple awardees, as fitting.
The submission deadline has now passed.
2022 Award Recipients
Best Dissertations in Affective Science Award
Hannah S. Savage, Ph.D., The Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University and Radboud University Medical Center.
For her dissertation entitled “The neural basis of threat and safety reversal learning in healthy subjects and patients with social anxiety disorder” that was completed at the University of Melbourne under the mentoring of Professor Ben Harrison.
Description: Responding flexibly to changing sources of threat and safety within the environment is crucial for human wellbeing and survival. This dissertation used complementary methods including functional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 and 7 Tesla, and measures of autonomic and subjective responding to advance current understanding of how the brain processes changing threat and safety signals. It further investigated the hypothesis that maladaptive threat and safety processing characterizes people with social anxiety disorder.
Meltem Yucel, Ph.D., Duke University
For her dissertation entitled “’No fair!’: An investigation of children’s development of fairness” that was completed at University of Virginia in May 2021 under the mentoring of Professor Amrisha Vaish.
Description: Children are sensitive to (un)fair distributions of resources. Through five studies with over 280 children and 540 adults, this dissertation established how children understand fairness norms, how fairness understanding changes with age, and the role of harm/affect in the moralization of fairness norms. These studies explain why children – and even adults – may not evaluate unfair distributions as negatively as other moral violations, namely, the indirect and less perceptible harm caused by unfairness. They suggest a potential explanation for why resource inequality is widely accepted in many societies. They also point to a potential solution: Emphasizing and making explicit the harm caused by unfairness.
Early-Career in Affective Science Awards
Daryl Cameron, Ph.D., Pennsylvania State University
Dr. Daryl Cameron is an accomplished early-career affective scientist who investigates the psychological processes involved in empathy and moral decision-making, with an emphasis on motivational factors and interpersonal behavior. His research is united by the theme that empathy is often a motivated choice: many apparent limitations of empathy may result from how people strategically weigh their costs and benefits. In a second line of research, Cameron uses tools from social cognitive psychology—including implicit measurement and mathematical modeling—to understand individual differences in moral intuitions and empathy for pain. His work has been published in venues such as the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, and Personality and Social Psychology Review.
Three representative publications:
Cameron, C. D., Hutcherson, C. A., Ferguson, A., Scheffer, J. A., Hadjiandreou, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2019). Empathy is hard work: People choose to avoid empathy because of its cognitive costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 962-976.
Spring, V. L., Cameron, C. D., & Cikara, M. (2018). The upside of outrage. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 1067-1069.
Cameron, C. D., Lindquist, K. A., & Gray, K. (2015). A constructionist review of morality and emotions: No evidence for specific links between moral content and discrete emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 371-394.
Dylan Gee, Ph.D., Yale University
Dr. Dylan Gee is a leading early-career affective scientist who studies the development of emotional learning and behavior, with a particular focus on neurodevelopmental mechanisms linking early adversity with risk for internalizing psychopathology. Among her many contributions, Dr. Gee’s research has identified ways in which the developing brain adapts to its early environment and provided novel insight into the impact of early experiences on corticolimbic circuitry and mental health. These findings have broad implications for clinical translation and optimizing interventions for youth with anxiety and stress-related psychopathology. Her work has been broadly recognized and published in academic journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, American Journal of Psychiatry, and Psychological Science.
Three representative publications:
Gee, D.G., & Cohodes, E.M. (2021). Caregiving Influences on Development: A Sensitive Period for Biological Embedding of Predictability and Safety Cues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(5), 376-383.
Cohodes, E.M., McCauley, S., & Gee, D.G. (2021). Parental Buffering of Stress in the Time of COVID-19: Family-Level Factors May Moderate the Association Between Pandemic-Related Stress and Youth Symptomatology. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 49(7), 935-948.
Meyer, H.C., Odriozola, P., Cohodes, E.M., Mandell, J.D., Li, A., Yang, R., Hall, B.S., Haberman, J.T., Zacharek, S.J., Liston, C., Lee, F.S., Gee, D.G. (2019). Ventral hippocampus interacts with prelimbic cortex during inhibition of threat response via learned safety in both mice and humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(52), 26970-26979.
Mid-Career Trajectory in Affective Science Award
Anthony D. Ong, Ph.D., Cornell University
Dr. Anthony Ong’s research focuses on the pathways linking positive emotions to diverse aspects of psychological functioning and physical health. This work is conducted in studies involving adolescents and adults that incorporate standard laboratory experiments, implicit and explicit behavioral measures, psychophysiology, and intensive longitudinal methods. Dr. Ong has shown that enduring and fragile forms of positive affect exert both risk-protective and risk-augmenting effects on health. Whereas positive affect that is enduring is relatively stable, positive affect that is fragile reflects short-term fluctuations that are variable and subject to external influence. His work has been published in academic journals including Perspectives on Psychological Science, Emotion, Psychological Science, Development and Psychopathology, and JAMA Network Open.
Five representative publications:
Ong, A. D., & Leger, K. (2022). Advancing the study of resilience to daily stressors. Perspectives on Psychological Science.
Ong, A. D., Urganci, B., Burrow, A. L., & DeHart, T. (2022). The relational wear and tear of everyday racism among African American couples. Psychological Science.
Ong, A. D., & Steptoe, A. (2020). Association of positive affect instability with all-cause mortality in older adults in England. JAMA Network Open. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7725.
Ong, A. D., & Burrow, A. L. (2018). Affective reactivity to daily racial discrimination as a prospective predictor of depressive symptoms in African American graduate and post-graduate students. Development and Psychopathology, 30, 1649-1659.
Ong, A. D., Benson, L. Zautra, A., & Ram, N. (2018). Emodiversity and biomarkers of inflammation. Emotion, 18, 3-14.
Integrative Affective Science Award
Jonathan Gratch, Ph.D., University of Southern California
Dr. Jonathan Gratch’s research focuses on computational models of human cognitive and social processes, especially emotion, and explores these models’ potential to both advance psychological theory and shape human-machine interaction. Trained in artificial intelligence and cognitive psychology, Dr. Gratch is notable for having built bridges across disciplines. For example, his collaboration with Stacy Marsella established synergistic connections between cognitive appraisal theory and research on intelligent software agents. His joint research with Judee Burgoon helped create “virtual humans” that could establish rapport with human partners, which has led to practical applications such as helping depressed individuals overcome their fear of disclosing their symptoms. His collaboration with social psychologists Tony Manstead, Brian Parkinson and Peter Carnevale led to theoretical advances on how facial expression influence social decisions and methodological advances in the use of computer techniques to study emotional signals. Dr. Gratch has also worked tirelessly to break down silos across affective science through his organizational activities at conferences (e.g., SAS, ISRE and ACII), journals (e.g., IEEE TAC, Emotion Review, and Affective Science) and teaching.
Four Representative Publications:
Gratch, J. & Marsella, S. (2014). Social Emotions in Nature and Artifact. Oxford University Press.
D’Mello, S., Kappas, A. & Gratch, J. (2018). The Affective Computing Approach to Affect Measurement. Emotion Review, 10, 174-183.
de Melo, C., Carnevale, P., Read, S. & Gratch, J. (2014). Reading people’s minds from emotion expressions in interdependent decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 73-88.
Gratch, J. & Marsella, S. (2004). A Domain-independent Framework for Modeling Emotion. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 5, 269-306.
The inaugural SAS Mentorship Award is jointly bestowed to Drs. Lisa Feldman Barrett and James Gross. This recognizes not only their respective outstanding devotion to the career development of their own mentees over the past three decades, but also their shared vision to create—and countless volunteer hours to build—the Society for Affective Science. Former trainees from the respective universities of Drs. Barrett and Gross remarked with great detail and sincere gratitude how the steady guidance, resources, advocacy, and kindnesses they received as a mentee shaped who they are today. In addition, unbeknownst to most current and former student members of our Society, SAS was launched expressly as a means to provide career support to more junior members of our field, especially those still in training. Through perennial SAS events such as Preconferences, Salons, Methods Workshops, and Speed Networking, Drs. Barrett and Gross opened up a steady stream of intergenerational conversations that continue to bolster and inspire early career affective scientists worldwide.
Lisa Feldman Barrett, Ph.D., Northeastern University
James J. Gross, Ph.D., Stanford University
Best Dissertation in Affective Science Award
Jennifer K. MacCormack, Ph.D.,University of Pittsburgh
For her dissertation entitled “Minding the body: The role of interoception in linking physiology and emotion during stress” that was completed at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill under the mentoring of Professor Kristen Lindquist.
Description: Interoception is a popular yet less understood construct in affective science, with most measures studied in isolation or without consideration of individual differences in physiological reactivity. Using a large sample, multi-methods, and advanced statistical modeling, this dissertation tested which facets of interoception (ability, sensibility, beliefs) may uniquely moderate the relation between physiological reactivity and subjective stress (emotion, somatic sensations). In particular, this work found that positive interoceptive beliefs can buffer against the deleterious effects of physiological reactivity and poor interoceptive ability in the context of acute stress—paving the way for new questions on mind-body relations in emotional experience.
Early-Career in Affective Science Award
Katharine H. Greenaway, Ph.D., University of Melbourne
Dr. Katie Greenaway is a leading early-career affective scientist, whose research focuses on the affective antecedents and consequences of social connection. Specifically, Dr. Greenaway has led two complementary lines of research that have shaped our field’s understanding of the role of emotions in social processes. First, her work exploring how emotions shape social connections, focusing on how emotion can be regulated to create social harmony or social distance, has made important contributions to our understanding of emotional expression and suppression. This work challenged basic assumptions about positive emotion expression and suppression, showing that expressing positive emotion can have social costs and suppressing positive emotion can have social benefits. Second, Dr. Greenaway’s research has explored how and why social groups improve emotional health and well-being. In this line of work, she has identified mechanisms through which social connections affect emotional well-being, for example, by demonstrating that feeling connected to social groups enhances feelings of personal control, and partly through this process reduces depression and increase life satisfaction.
Three representative publications:
Greenaway, K. H., Kalokerinos, E. K., & Williams, L. A. (2018). Context is everything (in emotion research). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(6), e12393.
Greenaway, K. H., & Kalokerinos, E. K. (2017). Suppress for success? Exploring the contexts in which expressing positive emotion can have social costs. European Review of Social Psychology, 28(1), 134-174.
Greenaway, K. H., & Kalokerinos, E. K. (2019). The intersection of goals to experience and express emotion. Emotion Review, 11(1), 50-62.
Mid-Career Trajectory in Affective Science Award
Abigail A. Marsh, Ph.D., Georgetown University
Dr. Abby Marsh’s areas of expertise include social and affective neuroscience, particularly understanding emotional processes like empathy and how they relate to altruism, aggression, and psychopathy. This work is conducted in studies of adolescents and adults that incorporate neuroimaging, cognitive and behavioral testing, and pharmacology techniques. In some of this work, Dr. Marsh has shown that the amygdala volume is larger in altruists and smaller in psychopaths, suggesting also that these two groups lie on opposite ends of a spectrum. She has also demonstrated through multiple studies that when altruists watch someone else feel pain, they have levels of activity in similar regions of their brain as when they were feeling the pain themselves, and concluded that altruists are better at recognizing the fear of others. Relatedly, Dr. Marsh leads work at Georgetown with altruistic donors, particularly those who donated kidneys to strangers. Her work has been published in academic journals including the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Psychological Science, the American Journal of Psychiatry, and JAMA Psychiatry. And her lab’s work on neural and cognitive correlates of extraordinary altruism was awarded the Cozzarelli Prize by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Five representative publications:
Marsh, A. A., Kozak, M. N., & Ambady, N. (2007). Accurate identification of fear facial expressions predicts prosocial behavior. Emotion, 7(2), 239.
Lozier, L. M., Cardinale, E. M., VanMeter, J. W., & Marsh, A. A. (2014). Mediation of the relationship between callous-unemotional traits and proactive aggression by amygdala response to fear among children with conduct problems. JAMA psychiatry, 71(6), 627-636.
Marsh, A. A., Stoycos, S. A., Brethel-Haurwitz, K. M., Robinson, P., VanMeter, J. W., & Cardinale, E. M. (2014). Neural and cognitive characteristics of extraordinary altruists. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(42), 15036-15041.
Marsh, A. A. (2019). The caring continuum: Evolved hormonal and proximal mechanisms explain prosocial and antisocial extremes. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 347-371.
Rhoads, S. A., Gunter, D., Ryan, R. M., & Marsh, A. A. (2021). Global variation in subjective well-being predicts seven forms of altruism. Psychological Science, 32(8), 1247-1261.